官网首页 | 中文 | English
 
 
 
 
当前位置: 首页>>科研动态>>双周学术论坛>>正文
 
 

161期双周学术论坛

[发布日期]:2015-12-19  [浏览次数]:

一、主题:Who Hate and Who Love the Leveling of the Playing Field?

二、主讲人:王盈,新加坡南洋理工大学金融学博士,2013年在欧洲工商管理学院(INSEAD)从事博士后研究,现任靠谱的十大网投实体平台(中国)有限公司讲师。她的主要研究方向包括:资产定价,公司金融,公司治理,机构投资者,并购与重组,企业社会责任等。论文曾参加2012 25th Australasian Finance and Banking Conference (Both PhD Forum and main conference), 2012 National Taiwan University International Conference on Finance, 2013年中国金融国际年会。

三、时间:2015年12月21日(周一),13:00-14:00

四、地点:学术会堂702会议室

五、主持人: 董兵兵,靠谱的十大网投实体平台(中国)有限公司讲师

论文摘要:

We find that institutional trading in aggregate cannot positively predict stock returns after 2000, suggesting that institutional investors as a group no longer have an information advantage after the adoption of Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD). Furthermore, we show that both the short-term and local institutional investors, who are documented to have an information advantage over their counterparts, lose their advantage in post-Reg FD period. By contrast, institutional investors who have skills in generating precise private information from public sources demonstrate a persistent and even greater information advantage. Last, we find that skilled institutional investors change their appetite for the information advantage to large and value stocks in post-Reg FD period. These findings imply that institutional investors rely heavily on selective disclosure to possess private information while Reg FD effectively levels the playing field and blocks their backdoors. Only the information advantage created from open sources is sustainable on the leveled playing field. Consequently, skilled institutional investors love the leveling of playing field but non-skilled institutional investors hate that.



上一条:163期双周学术论坛 下一条:162期双周学术论坛

关闭